News Science Quarterly (NS)

News Science Quarterly (NS)

Position of the Global Digital Compact in the Evolving Order of International Law and the Future of Global Digital Space Governance

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.Email: rezaei080@gmail.com
2 Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. Email: naviiiidfakhteh@gmail.com
3 Assistant Professor, Public and International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran. Email: motamednejad@atu.ac.ir
10.22034/lrsi.2025.535244.1400
Abstract
Objective: This article aims to analyze the Global Digital Compact by examining its objectives, legal nature, and structural shortcomings within the framework of international law. It further explores the mechanisms envisioned for its regional and global implementation, and seeks to situate the Compact within the broader context of the evolving international legal order and the future architecture of global digital governance.
Methods: The research adopts a descriptive-analytical methodology, It critically examines the Compact’s drafting process, its institutional design, and its proposed legal framework. Official UN documents, along with reports and statements by relevant international organizations, serve as the basis for assessing the Compact’s normative significance and its projected role in the international digital governance landscape.
Results: The rapid advancement of digital technology presents major global governance challenges. The UN's 2024 Global Digital Compact aims to create a shared framework for the digital world. However, critics worry it could worsen power imbalances and the digital divide. While a new UN office signals commitment, significant structural issues persist.
Conclusions: The study concludes that the Global Digital Compact marks a significant step toward establishing a coherent and inclusive framework for international digital governance. Anchored in a multi-stakeholder and human rights–based approach, it aspires to address the pressing risks and disruptions brought by emerging technologies. However, given the Compact’s non-binding character and the dynamic nature of technological evolution, its success will ultimately depend on sustained political will, robust global cooperation, and its integration within existing international legal mechanisms
Keywords

References
Cogburn, D. L. (2016). Big data analytics and text mining in internet governance research: Computational analysis of transcripts from 12 years of the internet governance forum. Target2013.
European Union. (2023, March). Contribution of the European Union to the Global Digital Compact. United Nations.
Hendrix, J. (2024, October 8). Reactions to the adoption of the UN Global Digital Compact. Tech Policy Press. https://www.techpolicy.press/reactions-to-the-adoption-of-the-un-global-digital-compact/
Hofmann, J. (2020). The multistakeholder concept as narrative: a discourse analytical approach (pp. 253-268). MIT Press.
Hurwitz, J. G. (2006). Whois WSIS; Whois IGF: The new consensus-based internet governance. Whois IGF: The New Consensus-Based Internet Governance (Febuary 20, 2007).
International Telecommunication Union. (2022). Meaningful connectivity (ITU Technical Report No. 16). ITU.
Islamic Republic of Iran. (2023, April). Contribution of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Global Digital Compact. United Nations.
Johansson, S. (2024). Digital Technologies for All? Postcolonial Insights on the Global Digital Compact.
Komaitis, K. (2024, December 16). Digital governance needs the IGF more than it needs a new UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies. Tech Policy Press. https://www.techpolicy.press/digital-governance-needs-the-igf-more-than-it-needs-a-new-un-office-for-digital-and-emerging-technologies/
Li, Z., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Gao, R., & Fang, X. (2025). Global digital compact: A mechanism for the governance of online discriminatory and misleading content generation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1381-1396.
Radu, R. (2019). Negotiating internet governance (p. 228). Oxford University Press.
Shokrallahi, Sh. & Motamaddenjad, R. (2025). Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Service of Humanity’s Interests and the Role of the United Nations. Journal of Communication Sciences, 14(1), 66–95.(In Persian)
Teleanu, S. (2024). Unpacking Global Digital Compact: Actors, Issues, and Processes. In: Msida and Genève: DiploFoundation.
United Nations General Assembly. (2024, September 20). Global Digital Compact (A/79/L.2). United Nations.
United Nations, Secretary-General. (2024, November). Revised estimates resulting from General Assembly resolution 79/1, entitled “The Pact for the Future” (A/79/583). United Nations.
United Nations, Secretary-General. (2025). Progress made in the implementation of and follow-up to the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society at the regional and international levels, including the 20-year review thereof (A/80/62–E/2025/12). United Nations.
United Nations. (2023, May). Our common agenda: Policy brief 5 – A Global Digital Compact: An open, free and secure digital future for all. United Nations.
United Nations. (2025, January 1). A new UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies [Press release]. United Nations. https://www.un.org/digital-emerging-technologies/content/press-release-new-un-office-digital-and-emerging-technologies
Vakil, A.S. & Norouzpour, H. (2020). Multi-Stakeholder Internet Governance and International Law: Common Concepts or a Novel Approach? Public Law Research, 21(66), 107–140.(In Persian)
Wylde, A. (2023). The UN Global Digital Compact (GDC), achieving a trusted, free, open, and secure internet: Trust-building. 22nd European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 06 December 2026