News Science

News Science

Discourse Analysis of Iran International Website's News Coverage of the Assembly of Experts and Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majlis) Elections

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master of Journalism, IRIB University, Tehran, Iran. Email: mostfagholami@gmail.com
2 Corresponding author, Assistant Professor, Department of Journalism department, IRIB University, Tehran, Iran. Email: e.fathi@iribu.ac.ir
3 Associate Professor, Department of Journalism, Faculty of Communication - Media Sciences, Broadcasting University (IRIB), Tehran, Iran. E-mail: minavand@iribu.ac.ir
10.22034/lrsi.2025.517718.1360
Abstract
Objective: Elections, as a fundamental component of democratic systems, facilitate the circulation and participation of political elites in governance. The Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) has consistently affirmed its commitment to republicanism alongside its Islamic identity. Consequently, elections have emerged as a strategic arena for adversarial engagement by foreign media actors seeking to influence political outcomes. This study investigates the discourse and ideological orientation of the *Iran International* network concerning Iran’s 2024 elections for the Assembly of Experts and the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
Methods: This research is grounded in critical discourse analysis and employs a hybrid analytical framework integrating Van Dijk’s three-dimensional model with the Laclau and Mouffe theory of discourse. A corpus of 229 news items published on the *Iran International* website between January 21 and March 1, 2024, was analyzed. The analysis accounted for the principle of ideological polarization and the broader socio-political context of the texts. Discourse signifiers were identified through qualitative analysis of the dataset using MAXQDA software.
Results: As in recent electoral cycles, two opposing discursive formations—namely, “maximum participation” and “election boycott”—dominated the discursive landscape. Iran International emerged as a proponent of the boycott discourse, seeking to suppress voter turnout through a range of strategies: foregrounding the country’s deteriorating economic conditions; amplifying internal rifts among political factions; fostering voter apathy by delegitimizing the efficacy of electoral participation; exposing financial corruption among state officials; representing the IRI as a securitized and repressive regime; and marginalizing moderate and reformist political currents. Through these mechanisms, the network constructed a narrative in which electoral participation was reframed as complicity in perpetuating the status quo and reproducing systemic corruption and violence. Furthermore, by adopting an interactive communication model and flattening hierarchical media flows, “Iran International” positioned itself as a proxy for public grievances, thereby enhancing its symbolic and social capital.
Conclusion: The study’s findings indicate that Iran International’s promotion of the election boycott and its orchestration of discursive polarization are part of a broader strategy aimed at the gradual delegitimization of the IRI and the normalization of regime-change discourse. In doing so, the network not only marginalized moderate and intermediary political forces but also emphasized ethnic and sectarian cleavages, while simultaneously constructing counter-hegemonic narratives in direct opposition to the ideological foundations of the IRI.
Keywords

 
References:
Bashiriyeh, H. (2017). Political science education: Foundations of theoretical and institutional political science (12th ed.). Negah-e Moaser Publishing. (In Persian)
Buist, E. A., & Manson, D. S. (2010). Newspapers framing and stadium subsidization. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(10), 1492–1510.
Castells, M. (2022). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (M. Gholipour, Trans., 9th ed.). Markaz Publishing. (In Persian)
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran; Along with the Interpretive Opinions of the Guardian Council. (2018). (M. Fathi & K. Koohi Esfahani, Eds.). Guardian Council Research Institute. (In Persian)
Entman, R. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102.
Euronews. (2024, May 29). Amnesty International annual report: 75% of last year's global executions took place in Iran. https://parsi.euronews.com/2024/05/29/amnesty-international-annual-report-on-executions-shows-worldwide-jump-as-iran-fuels-2023 (In Persian)
Gholami, M., Fathi, E., & Amiri, J. (2022). The image of the 11th Iran parliamentary elections in the discourse of Iran International TV channel. Islamic Politics Research, 9(20), 281–315. (In Persian)
Gholami, M. (2021). The comparison of the discourse of IRIB News Agency website and Iran International TV channel website in the news coverage of the parliamentary elections 1398 [Master's thesis, IRIB University]. (In Persian)
Giles, D. (2003). Media psychology. Routledge.
Gowhary, H., Rahimi, F., Azizifar, A., & Jamalinesari, A. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of the electoral talks of Iranian presidential candidates in 2013. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, (192), 132–141.
Hamshahri Online. (2024, July 24). Saudi execution in Saudi Arabia: What's happening in Saudi Arabia? hamshahrionline.ir/x9pNZ (In Persian)
Houshyar, M., & Goudarzi, M. (2020). Discourse analysis of Iran International and Deutsche Welle: "U.S. Marine coalition in the Persian Gulf and Oman Sea." News Science Quarterly, 9(1), 69–100. (In Persian)
Hosseini, H. (2003). The Internet and psychological operations: The case of the Iraq War. Defense Policy, 11(44), 9–31. (In Persian)
Hosseinizadeh, M. A. (2004). Discourse theory and political analysis. Political Science, (28), 181–212. (In Persian)
IRNA. (2024, March 1). More than 10 million people in Tehran province are eligible to vote. irna.ir/xjPW7b (In Persian)
IRNA. (2020, February 23). Minister of Interior: The participation rate in the parliamentary elections is 42.57%. irna.ir/xjxmkf (In Persian)
Johnes, R., Faucon, B., & Hagey, K. (2019, April 15). Saudi Arabia sought Vice's help to build a media empire. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/saudi-arabia-sought-vices-help-to-build-a-media-empire-11549621800
Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2016). Theory and method in discourse analysis (6th ed.). Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
Kamali Dehghan, S. (2018, October 2). Ofcom examining TV network over interview praising attack in Iran. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/oct/02/ofcom-investigates-tv-network-interview-praising-terror-attack-iran
Khan, M. H., Qazalbash, F., Adnan, H. M., Yaqin, L. N., & Khuhro, R. A. (2021). Trump and Muslims: A critical discourse analysis of Islamophobic rhetoric in Donald Trump's selected tweets. SAGE Open, 11(1).
Law on the Election of the Assembly of Experts. (2023). shora-gc.ir/0001XW (In Persian)
Lungu, A. M. (2001). The Internet and psychological operations. Joint Forces Quarterly, (28), 13–17.
Minavand, M. G. (2008). An introduction to Internet and political development: Public sphere in cyberspace. Politics Quarterly, 38(2), 253–275. (In Persian)
Ministry of Interior of IRI. (2023a, March 4). Report of the Interior Minister on the glorious holding of the March 1 election. moi.ir/x3VBX (In Persian)
Ministry of Interior of IRI. (2023b, March 4). Final results of vote counting in Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat, Eslamshahr, and Pardis published. moi.ir/x3VxH (In Persian)
Moghadamfar, A. (2018). A reflection on the Iran International satellite network. National Security Watch, (81), 77–83. (In Persian)
Mohammad Hosseini Taheri, J. (2020). "A report from Al-Akhbar quoted by Mashregh": Saudi firewood and American gasoline. Mobaleghan, (249), 49–57. (In Persian)
Moqaddami, M. T. (2011). A critique of Ernesto Laclau's and Chantal Mouffe's theory of discourse analysis. Ma'rifat-e Farhangi Ejtemai, 2(2), 91–124. (In Persian)
Mousavi Khomeini, R. (1999a). Sahifeh-ye Imam: Collection of Imam Khomeini's works (Vol. 8). Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. (In Persian)
Mousavi Khomeini, R. (1999b). Sahifeh-ye Imam: Collection of Imam Khomeini's works (Vol. 13). Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. (In Persian)
Mowlana, H. (1995). Images and the crisis of political legitimacy. In Y. R. Kamalipour (Ed.), The U.S. media and the Middle East: Image and perception. Greenwood Press.
Noori Mamarabadi, A., Razmjoo, A. A., & Nazari, H. (2019). Comparing the news discourses in Persian British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and Voice of America (VOA) websites regarding the 5th period of Assembly of Experts for Leadership Election. Media Studies, 14(1), 39–57. (In Persian)
Pedram, M., & Mohammadzadeh, M. (2004). Ideology, hegemony, and domination in the media. Resaneh, 15(1), 77–94. (In Persian)
Razmjoo, A. A., & Eslaminejad, M. (2019). A critical discourse analysis on 12th Iranian presidential election candidates in TV debates. Political Sociology of Iran, 2(2), 99–128. (In Persian)
Razmjoo, A. A., Nazari, A., & Nazari, H. (2023). News discourse analysis of the Persian media in the 13th Iranian presidential elections: Case study of the Persian websites of VOA and Euronews. Political Sociology of Iran, 5(12), 3736–3762. (In Persian)
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.
Severin, W. J., & Tankard, J. W. (2002). Communication theories (A. Dehghan, Trans., 11th ed.). University of Tehran Press. (In Persian)
Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2007). Framing on the processing of persuasive health message: The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message. Communication Research, 34(4), 433–467.
Sultani, S. A. A., Tafazzoli, B., & Sedqi Chokanlu, R. (2008). An analysis of political discourses in the media. Political Science, 11(42), 65–93. (In Persian)
Sultani, S. A. A. (2004). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Political Science, 7(28), 153–180. (In Persian)