نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Objective: This study elucidates the conceptual shift from traditional privacy doctrines to the independent notion of personal data protection within cyberspace. Traditional privacy frameworks - grounded in protection against physical intrusion and rooted in negative rights - prove inadequate in addressing the challenges posed by contemporary surveillance regimes and big data analytics. A comparative examination of the American tradition (characterized by liberal individualism and a negative, non-interventionist approach) and the European tradition (underpinned by human dignity and a positive, regulatory orientation) demonstrates that personal data protection constitutes a fundamental transformation in rights discourse. This evolution carries significant implications for journalism, investigative reporting, and media information management.
Method: This research employs a comparative analytical method, utilizing qualitative content analysis of legislation, judicial precedents, and academic texts from both American and European jurisdictions. The study traces the conceptual transition from location-based privacy to personal data protection in cyberspace through documentary and library-based sources.
Results: The findings reveal a pronounced dichotomy in approaches. The American tradition - grounded in individualism, negative liberty, and state non-intervention - defines privacy through the lens of individual control and the right to be let alone, thereby producing a reactive, fragmented, and inherently limited framework that struggles to counteract the power of technology monopolies. By contrast, the European tradition, anchored in human dignity and the regulatory state, has established a proactive and integrated framework, exemplified by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This model recognizes affirmative rights - including access, rectification, erasure, and compensation - imposes binding obligations on data processors, and offers a clearer legal basis for reconciling journalistic freedoms with data privacy protections.
Conclusion: This paper ultimately argues that personal data protection has evolved into an independent, affirmative, and third-generation right, complementing and, in many respects, surpassing the negative and defensive right to privacy. The relative success of the European model in balancing individual and collective interests - through the mandates of transparency, accountability, and Privacy by Design - presents a framework that is adaptable, yet requires intelligent localization for developing legal systems, including in the domain of regulating media and journalistic activities. The future of governance in the digital age depends upon embracing this paradigm shift and establishing effective regulatory institutions capable of addressing emerging challenges.
کلیدواژهها English
